• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Winning results of the Urban Zoo Coworking Space competition

By Justine Testado|

Friday, Mar 8, 2019

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

The Urban Zoo Coworking Space design competition challenged entrants to create a unique interior concept for a new chain of coworking spaces planning to launch their first location in the heart of Latvia’s capital city of Riga. 

In evaluating the submissions, the jury focused on the quality, versatility, and adaptability of the designs, as well as their dedication to creating a distinct, recognizable interior identity. 

The competition concluded with three prize winners and six honorable mentions. Scroll down for a glimpse of the top three prize winners.

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

Jury commentary: “The Menagerie project features a modern and coherent color scheme that was eye catching, inviting, and incredibly stylised. It really complimented the concept of an ‘urban zoo’, creating an energetic atmosphere in which workers could connect, exchange, and collaborate. The submitted designs offered a clear and understandable concept that included an uncomplicated scheme of forms, shapes, and colors that complimented the furniture. And while unique, the scheme could easily be replicated in any type of space and has the potential to become the signature interior for the Urban Zoo Coworking brand.”

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.

Jury commentary: “WILD took modular design to the next level, with its “Kit of Parts” enabling users to customise their work space towards either individual, isolated work, or fostering collaboration and networking within the space. The project really played well with the theme of a zoo environment, exploring varying levels of exposure established through the lightweight framework of its modular system. The jury selected this project as a runner-up because the highly-functional proposed grid system showed extreme originality and ingenuity, offering a variety of different types of working spaces, presentation platforms, and storage areas. And while the design has great potential in becoming a part of the Urban Zoo Coworking bran, the jury did have slight concerns about the practicalities of the structure installation, maintenance, and cost.”

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.

Jury commentary: “The Habitat project is one of the few conventional designs, with a straightforward color scheme of natural wood and plants to create a habitat where creatives could escape the rat race. The jury panel especially complimented the smart and coherent approach to zoning, with different areas being defined as settlements, nests, and jungles, each constructed by a unique arrangement of modular units. The selection of the modular furniture, as well as the overall level of the concept detail, made for a compelling and intriguing working environment.”

You can check out the winning results in more detail here.

All images courtesy of Bee Breeders Architecture Competitions.

RELATED COMPETITION Urban Zoo Coworking Design Challenge

Related

urban zoo coworking design challenge ● coworking ● office design ● ideas competition ● bee breeders architecture competition ● bee breeders ● competition ● interior design

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Winning results of the Urban Zoo Coworking Space competition

New architecture and design competitions: creative awards, Shanghai toys, rammed earth, and a Women's House in Senegal

Sponsored Post by Azure Magazine

With an All-New Urban Design Category, the AZ Awards Kicks Off a New Decade. Now’s the Time to Submit Your Best Work

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

Spirala Community Home advance registration deadline is approaching!

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

Tiny Kiwi Meditation Cabin advance registration deadline is approaching!

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

The Sleeping Pods on a Cliff advance registration deadline is approaching!

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

The SKYHIVE 2021 Skyscraper Challenge​ advance registration deadline is approaching!

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

Toronto Affordable Housing Challenge advance registration deadline is approaching!

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

The Last Nuclear Bomb Memorial advance registration deadline is approaching!

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

The Omuli Museum of the Horse advance registration deadline is approaching!

New York-based studio POP Architecture wins honorable mention for Korean War Memorial Park for Civil Victims

Sponsored Post by SCI-Arc

Expand the frontiers of architecture in the twenty-first century with SCI-Arc's EDGE Programs

Gaudi Architecture Prize: winning student design projects

2020 RIBA Annie Spink Award presented to Lesley Lokko

Architecture and design competitions with upcoming deadlines in China, Italy, Korea, and Romania

AIA California announces 2020 Paul Welch Jr. ARE Scholarship recipients

Next page » Loading

Winning results of the Urban Zoo Coworking Space competition

By Justine Testado|

Friday, Mar 8, 2019

Share

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

Related

urban zoo coworking design challenge ● coworking ● office design ● ideas competition ● bee breeders architecture competition ● bee breeders ● competition ● interior design

The Urban Zoo Coworking Space design competition challenged entrants to create a unique interior concept for a new chain of coworking spaces planning to launch their first location in the heart of Latvia’s capital city of Riga. 

In evaluating the submissions, the jury focused on the quality, versatility, and adaptability of the designs, as well as their dedication to creating a distinct, recognizable interior identity. 

The competition concluded with three prize winners and six honorable mentions. Scroll down for a glimpse of the top three prize winners.

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

Jury commentary: “The Menagerie project features a modern and coherent color scheme that was eye catching, inviting, and incredibly stylised. It really complimented the concept of an ‘urban zoo’, creating an energetic atmosphere in which workers could connect, exchange, and collaborate. The submitted designs offered a clear and understandable concept that included an uncomplicated scheme of forms, shapes, and colors that complimented the furniture. And while unique, the scheme could easily be replicated in any type of space and has the potential to become the signature interior for the Urban Zoo Coworking brand.”

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.

Jury commentary: “WILD took modular design to the next level, with its “Kit of Parts” enabling users to customise their work space towards either individual, isolated work, or fostering collaboration and networking within the space. The project really played well with the theme of a zoo environment, exploring varying levels of exposure established through the lightweight framework of its modular system. The jury selected this project as a runner-up because the highly-functional proposed grid system showed extreme originality and ingenuity, offering a variety of different types of working spaces, presentation platforms, and storage areas. And while the design has great potential in becoming a part of the Urban Zoo Coworking bran, the jury did have slight concerns about the practicalities of the structure installation, maintenance, and cost.”

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.

Jury commentary: “The Habitat project is one of the few conventional designs, with a straightforward color scheme of natural wood and plants to create a habitat where creatives could escape the rat race. The jury panel especially complimented the smart and coherent approach to zoning, with different areas being defined as settlements, nests, and jungles, each constructed by a unique arrangement of modular units. The selection of the modular furniture, as well as the overall level of the concept detail, made for a compelling and intriguing working environment.”

You can check out the winning results in more detail here.

All images courtesy of Bee Breeders Architecture Competitions.

RELATED COMPETITION Urban Zoo Coworking Design Challenge

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Intermediate to Senior FFE Designer – Hospitality Projects

Roman and Williams Buildings and Interiors

Intermediate to Senior FFE Designer – Hospitality Projects

New York, NY, US

Architectural Designer

Bone/Levine Architects

Architectural Designer

New York, NY, US

Intermediate Architectural Drafter/Designer

Urban Arena

Intermediate Architectural Drafter/Designer

Costa Mesa, CA, US

Project Architect

Dahlin Group Architecture Planning

Project Architect

San Diego, CA, US

Project Architect

Frances Mildred LLC

Project Architect

New York, NY, US

Project Architect, Commercial Studio

ShubinDonaldson

Project Architect, Commercial Studio

Los Angeles, CA, US

Junior Architect (1-4 Years Experience)

Bates Masi + Architects

Junior Architect (1-4 Years Experience)

East Hampton, NY, US

Project Landscape Architect

Snøhetta

Project Landscape Architect

New York, NY, US

Architect/Designer with 8+ years of experience

Chet Callahan Architecture

Architect/Designer with 8+ years of experience

Los Angeles, CA, US

Project Architect - Healthcare

Posen Architects LLC

Project Architect - Healthcare

West Orange, NJ, US

Next page » Loading