MAO Debates: Not More Not Less

Exploring the wiggle room of contemporary architectural practice. MAO, Museum of Architecture and Design, Ljubljana will host a symposium Not More, Not Less on 1 April this year which is a part of the new MAO Debates series. This year the MAO Debates feature four international architects and one architectural critic and curator discussing how they deal with these issues in their work Jacob van Rijs, MVRDV, Rotterdam; Mark Lee, Johnstonmarklee, L.A.; Duncan Lewis, Scape architecture, Bordeaux; Jörg Leeser, BeL, Cologne as well as Philip Ursprung, Chair of Architectural History and Theory, ETH Zurich. The symposium has been curated by Ilka & Andreas Ruby, textbild, Berlin who will also moderate the discussion. The starting point they set up for MAO Debates is that with regard to its immanent powers, architecture today seems to be both under-challenged and over-charged at the same time. This biomorphic paradigm has reduced architecture's potential to just dealing with issues concerning geometry, form-making, and manufacturing, whilst depriving it of any political impact. On the other hand, there is a programmatic notion of practice which reduces architecture to a predominantly political project, ignoring the fact that a building must eventually embody its contents through its tectonic and formal definition. At a time when the presence of architecture appears to be both larger than life (given its symbolical value as a media spectacle) and close to irrelevant (with regard to its influence in the actual construction of our overall built environment), it is vital to recalibrate the agency spectrum that architecture can truly inhabit. What is this not-less-and-not-more concept? What are the irreducible and quintessential assets that architecture is able to – and needs to – muster in order to optimise its contribution to the formation of our world? Which aspects of its alleged essence can architecture renounce, and which must it defend at all costs? In view of the increasingly market-driven transformation of the construction sector, architects are exposed to questions such as these on a daily basis. When subjected to constantly changing conditions such as a sudden budget cut, a change of developer or a redefinition of a building's programme, architects are required to develop a s trategic intelligence regarding the balancing of effort and effect that needs to occur in order to strike a balance between the architectural effects that they desire and the level of effort permitted by the client or, indeed, the circumstances. Programme Friday, 1 April 2011, 10.00 to 17.00 10.00 – Registration and coffee 10.15 – Intro, Ilka and Andreas Ruby, Textbild (Berlin) 10.30 – Mark Lee, Johnstonmarklee (Los Angeles) 11.30 – Duncan Lewis (Bordeaux) 12.30 – Lunch 13.30 – Jacob van Rijs, MVRDV (Rotterdam) 14.30 – Jörg Leeser, BeL (Köln) 15.30 – Philip Ursprung, ETH (Zurich) 16.30 – Closing discussion The symposium will be held in English. www.mao.si