The Iron Ring designed by rising talent George King Architects wins sculpture contest for Flint Castle landmark
By Mackenzie Goldberg|
Friday, Jul 21, 2017
Located in Flint, Flintshire, Flint Castle was the first of a series of castles that formed a chain of fortresses known as Edward I's "Iron Ring." As part of the King's campaign to conquer Wales, the castle was built in local Millstone Grit ashlar and sandstone by 1,800 laborers and masons. The site has stood for over 700 years and today is managed as a public monument.
In an effort to rejuvenate the town of Flint and draw in tourists, the city has been working towards a multi-million pound regeneration plan that includes transforming the castle into a key site for tourism. Part of this transformation includes the installation of a stainless-steel spiral staircase and other improvements, but the most expensive will be the addition of a £400,000 landmark sculpture, the plans for which were unveiled yesterday.
Following a nation-wide competition to obtain proposals for an artwork concept celebrating Wales’ Year of Legends, the panel—comprised of the Welsh Government and sponsored body, Arts Council for Wales—has selected the winning design. Submitted by George King Architects, the design is for a giant iron ring meant to reference the chain of castles Flint belongs to as well as, more symbolically, the crown. George King, one of the architects behind the ambitious design, said "the sculpture will take a balanced form, some buried beneath the ground, the remainder projecting into the air, to demonstrate the unstable nature of the crown." As described in Shakespeare's Richard II, Flint is the site where Richard II famously surrendered the crown to Henry IV.
The sculpture will potentially stand at 23 feet high and 98 feet wide and is designed as a cantilevered bridge structure formed from weathering steel. Visitors will be able to walk along the bridge, which will be engraved with words and sayings chosen by the community that celebrate local landmarks, historic towns, and their links with Flint Castle. "The sculpture has been carefully designed to work at many scales. From afar its striking, iconic form resembles a giant ancient artifact, washed up on the shore of the Dee Estuary" King said. “Its scale and dynamic appearance means that it will become an instantly recognizable landmark for the area. However, as you approach the sculpture it becomes obvious that the piece is more than just a sculpture.”
Share
9 Comments
lazylabourout · Jul 23, 17 10:59 PM
Absolutely! Us taffs should quite rightly celebrate and be eternally grateful for the fact that we were conquered and subjugated by the English who tried to wipe out our language and culture off the face of the planet and make us English.
Robin Huw Bowen · Jul 24, 17 1:10 AM
Ie wir! A byddwch r?an, er mwyn denu mwy o dwristiaid i Jersey, yn dylunio cerflun neis, del, artistig ar lun swastika? Dwi ddim yn meddwl felly! Mae haerllugrwydd y Sais wrth ein trin ni'r Cymry a'n hanes a'n diwylliant lawn mor fyw ag erioed. Mae'n bryd i chi ddechrau dysgu i'n parchu.
siônjobbins · Jul 24, 17 9:32 AM
Hurrah! Let's celebrate the conquest of Wales. Edward cut off the head of the last Prince of Wales, Llywelyn in 1282, placed it on a pole in London for all to mock. A revolt in 1283 was quashed.
The castles were built to keep down the natives and a system of apartheid was instigated which ruled where Welsh people could live and do commerce. The castles of Wales weren't build as cuddly or post-modern tourist attractions, they were build as Israelis or apartheid South Africa build watch towers and forts.
And please, don't give us the glib 'European monarchs'.
This scultpure should never be built.
Would the English celebrate (and that's what is is) Napoleon or Hitler's 'ring of steel' castles had history turned out differently?
I'm all for regenerating Flint and drawing people to the castle. But I'm fed up seeing Welsh government bodies with people on good salaries and perks celebrate the subjection of Wales whilst refusing to fund a sculture for Tryweryn by John Meirion Morris, or Glyndwr's Sycharth. And this constant apprisal of Welsh history through the norms of English historiography - that is, it's only important if it relates to England. Welsh history and historical landmarks, can't just stand on themselves, they, we, have to justify ourselves to others.
Ignorant, arrogant and insulting.
siônjobbins · Jul 24, 17 9:32 AM
https://nation.cymru/2017/iron...
leiawelsh · Jul 24, 17 10:32 AM
What in the wide world possessed the designers to think Wales wanted a sculpture celebrating a war of conquest we lost? And what demented colonial-mindset-afflicted Dic Siôn Dafydd approved it?
Seriously - they need to read the responses, go back to the drawing board and think again.
Robin Huw Bowen · Jul 24, 17 10:43 AM
And indeed, just how much money from the WELSH public purse has already been paid to this ENGLISH company in LONDON for just even thinking about designing this affront? I bet it's already even more than the maximum 'Large Grant' that Cyngor Celfyddydau Cymru pay to 'Groups/Bodies' here in Wales for any creative project they might think of doing, ie £30,000 ...
dewifflint · Jul 24, 17 2:04 PM
Nid eu hanes nhw yw ein hanes ni.
The sooner the Brits are kicked out of Wales the sooner we can start to repair the destruction they have wrought.
Rhian M · Jul 24, 17 6:34 PM
Do not build this cruel symbol of tyranny.Stop it now!
Gareth Westacott · Jul 24, 17 7:40 PM
I wonder whether the company is aware of the sensitivity of this issue and the historical symbolism of the concept of an 'iron ring' to the Welsh psyche. If I were their PR advisor I would be telling them to get the hell out of this project NOW, otherwise it will be a costly PR disaster for George King.
Comment as :