• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Helsinki Harbor's Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design names five shortlist teams

By Josh Niland|

Thursday, Dec 19, 2024

Photo: Sami Saastamoinen

Five finalists have been named in the competition to create the first home for the Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design in Helsinki’s South Harbor area. 

The designer’s names will remain anonymous through this stage while entries are listed by their initial number and title. A total of 624 were submitted from across the world. The 13-member jury will grant each a €50,000 ($52,000) development fee and expects to come back with the final winner's announcement by September 2025.

Beate Hølmebakk, jury panel member and partner at Manthey Kula in Oslo said: “The five finalist projects represent different visions for an inviting and inspirational museum situated on one of Helsinki’s most important sites. What these entries share is their potential to be buildings of extraordinary and lasting architectural quality. It is the jury’s opinion that they all have distinct urban presence and exceptional spatial properties that allow the new museum of architecture and design to organize the rich variety of exhibitions and events their ambition calls for. In the next phase these projects will be further developed to meet the demands for a sustainable future.”

The proposals that have advanced to stage 2 of the competition will be in development until it begins in February 2025. The shortlisted teams will have until May 2025 to make based on jury feedback.

351 Kumma

351 Kumma

Jury comments: "The new museum building has been designed as a compact and low structure, preserving important views from Tähtitorninvuori Park towards the Market Square and Katajanokka. Despite its low height, the building has a strong character. It is beautifully proportioned, with slanted, stepped walls and triangular openings that reference timeless historical themes. Unlike the other proposals, the building can be accessed from both the Market Square and Laivasillankatu sides, allowing visitors to enter directly into the ground-floor exhibition space."

486 Moby

486 Moby

Jury comments: "The proposal takes an exceptional stance on views from the site and the museum’s role as a public building alongside the blocks planned for Makasiiniranta. The new building has a wedge-shaped footprint, leaving space on the side for views from the waterfront toward Tähtitorninvuori Park. The movement of museum visitors between spaces has been carefully designed, and the views opening in different directions from the building have been thoughtfully considered. Thanks to its compact form, logical structural system, and use of recycled materials, the building is resource-efficient."

545 Tau

545 Tau

Jury comments: "The building is sculptural in its extreme simplicity. It demonstrates that to stand out from the surrounding urban fabric a landmark status can be achieved without relying on unconventional shapes, or distinctive materials. The design emphasizes the role of the new museum as an extension of the Market Square, welcoming visitor flows along its entire northern façade, which connects seamlessly to the water mirror of the Vironallas basin."

616 City Sky and Sea

616 City Sky and Sea

Jury comments: "Thanks to its curved wall and roof surfaces, the new building appears tent-like and lightweight in the waterfront landscape, where it fits naturally in front of the existing block frontage. The museum is designed with a distinctive and strong spatial structure: the exhibition spaces surrounding the central hall offer carefully selected views of the sea and the surrounding city."

96 Tyrsky

96 Tyrsky

Jury comments: "The curved-roofed building, clad entirely in green copper, blends seamlessly into the waterfront landscape and respects the existing surroundings with its moderate height. The structure consists of several rectangular interlocking volumes, creating a small inner courtyard that allows daylight to reach the center of the building. The undulating curved roof signifies that this is a public building, distinct from the neighboring blocks. The proposal is an excellent example of the use of mass timber in load-bearing structures and interior finishes."

RELATED NEWS Helsinki launches New Museum of Architecture and Design competition

Related

helsinki ● finland ● finnish architecture ● finnish museum of architecture and design ● competition ● design museum ● europe

Share

  • Follow

    7 Comments

  • reallynotmyname
    reallynotmyname

    reallynotmyname ·  Dec 19, 24 3:26 PM

    The copper one, #96 is the best by far.  

    The ones with blank walls at the ground and few to no windows upstairs look like old department stores that should be attached to a mall in the USA somewhere.


  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 5:00 PM

    Is it the same location as the aborted guggenheim?


  • Alexander Walter ·  Dec 19, 24 5:45 PM

    Are we playing GUESS THAT ARCHITECT again? Any obvious clues?

  • The_Crow
    The_Crow

    The_Crow ·  Dec 19, 24 5:52 PM

    Yep, same location as the guggenheim. Probably has the same likelihood of being realized too. 

  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 6:24 PM

    weird that this post has no thumbs up/down or reply - Looks like #96 is the reincarnation of the dead guggenheim, with curved roofs and open ground floors... could be the same team?

  • arun
    arun

    arun ·  Dec 20, 24 12:47 AM

    Very poor urban design in all of them. At least the first scheme's (Kumma) low height allows sun and water views for the existing building behind it. Why can't architects use their creativity to minimize negative impacts on the buildings around them? Maybe even make their proposals look like they "fit" in their location and context too.

    Sadly, architecture as artifact still rules.

  • ivakravitz
    ivakravitz

    ivakravitz ·  Dec 20, 24 9:26 AM

    Not to mention the total lack of landscape design on any of these. They look naked, as does the waterfront.

  • Comment as :

Helsinki Harbor's Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design names five shortlist teams

New architecture and design competitions: IDEAS Awards, UIA-HYP CUP International Student Competition, Vancouver Tall Challenge, and Memorial to the Sixth Extinction

Best small projects chosen at AIA Small Project Award 2026

10 standout sustainable projects honored at AIA COTE Top Ten Award 2026

Best residential architecture of 2026 honored at AIA Housing Award

Best new interiors of 2026 chosen at AIA Interior Architecture Awards

Best global architecture honored at RIBA International Awards 2026

World’s most beautiful airports of 2026 chosen by Prix Versailles

New architecture and design competitions: Brick in Architecture Awards, Study Architecture Student Showcase, N.Y.C. Groceries, and New York High Falls Riverfront Market

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

SmithGroup’s ‘pioneering’ Philip Merrill Environmental Center wins AIA Twenty-five Year Award

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Museum of Emotions / Edition #8 FINAL registration deadline is in 5 DAYS!

Here are the winners of the 2026 AIA Architecture Awards

40 emerging architects and designers under 40 from Europe honored

Northwestern University selects 12-firm longlist to design new engineering building

New architecture and design competitions: Exploring 130 Years of American Design, Christo & Jeanne-Claude Center, 13 White Houses, and La Pyramide

Micro-architecture honored in latest Tiny House Architecture Competition

Next page » Loading

Helsinki Harbor's Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design names five shortlist teams

By Josh Niland|

Thursday, Dec 19, 2024

Share

Photo: Sami Saastamoinen

Related

helsinki ● finland ● finnish architecture ● finnish museum of architecture and design ● competition ● design museum ● europe

Five finalists have been named in the competition to create the first home for the Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design in Helsinki’s South Harbor area. 

The designer’s names will remain anonymous through this stage while entries are listed by their initial number and title. A total of 624 were submitted from across the world. The 13-member jury will grant each a €50,000 ($52,000) development fee and expects to come back with the final winner's announcement by September 2025.

Beate Hølmebakk, jury panel member and partner at Manthey Kula in Oslo said: “The five finalist projects represent different visions for an inviting and inspirational museum situated on one of Helsinki’s most important sites. What these entries share is their potential to be buildings of extraordinary and lasting architectural quality. It is the jury’s opinion that they all have distinct urban presence and exceptional spatial properties that allow the new museum of architecture and design to organize the rich variety of exhibitions and events their ambition calls for. In the next phase these projects will be further developed to meet the demands for a sustainable future.”

The proposals that have advanced to stage 2 of the competition will be in development until it begins in February 2025. The shortlisted teams will have until May 2025 to make based on jury feedback.

351 Kumma

351 Kumma

Jury comments: "The new museum building has been designed as a compact and low structure, preserving important views from Tähtitorninvuori Park towards the Market Square and Katajanokka. Despite its low height, the building has a strong character. It is beautifully proportioned, with slanted, stepped walls and triangular openings that reference timeless historical themes. Unlike the other proposals, the building can be accessed from both the Market Square and Laivasillankatu sides, allowing visitors to enter directly into the ground-floor exhibition space."

486 Moby

486 Moby

Jury comments: "The proposal takes an exceptional stance on views from the site and the museum’s role as a public building alongside the blocks planned for Makasiiniranta. The new building has a wedge-shaped footprint, leaving space on the side for views from the waterfront toward Tähtitorninvuori Park. The movement of museum visitors between spaces has been carefully designed, and the views opening in different directions from the building have been thoughtfully considered. Thanks to its compact form, logical structural system, and use of recycled materials, the building is resource-efficient."

545 Tau

545 Tau

Jury comments: "The building is sculptural in its extreme simplicity. It demonstrates that to stand out from the surrounding urban fabric a landmark status can be achieved without relying on unconventional shapes, or distinctive materials. The design emphasizes the role of the new museum as an extension of the Market Square, welcoming visitor flows along its entire northern façade, which connects seamlessly to the water mirror of the Vironallas basin."

616 City Sky and Sea

616 City Sky and Sea

Jury comments: "Thanks to its curved wall and roof surfaces, the new building appears tent-like and lightweight in the waterfront landscape, where it fits naturally in front of the existing block frontage. The museum is designed with a distinctive and strong spatial structure: the exhibition spaces surrounding the central hall offer carefully selected views of the sea and the surrounding city."

96 Tyrsky

96 Tyrsky

Jury comments: "The curved-roofed building, clad entirely in green copper, blends seamlessly into the waterfront landscape and respects the existing surroundings with its moderate height. The structure consists of several rectangular interlocking volumes, creating a small inner courtyard that allows daylight to reach the center of the building. The undulating curved roof signifies that this is a public building, distinct from the neighboring blocks. The proposal is an excellent example of the use of mass timber in load-bearing structures and interior finishes."

RELATED NEWS Helsinki launches New Museum of Architecture and Design competition

Share

  • Follow

    7 Comments

  • reallynotmyname

    reallynotmyname ·  Dec 19, 24 3:26 PM

    The copper one, #96 is the best by far.  

    The ones with blank walls at the ground and few to no windows upstairs look like old department stores that should be attached to a mall in the USA somewhere.


  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 5:00 PM

    Is it the same location as the aborted guggenheim?


  • Alexander Walter ·  Dec 19, 24 5:45 PM

    Are we playing GUESS THAT ARCHITECT again? Any obvious clues?

  • The_Crow

    The_Crow ·  Dec 19, 24 5:52 PM

    Yep, same location as the guggenheim. Probably has the same likelihood of being realized too. 

  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 6:24 PM

    weird that this post has no thumbs up/down or reply - Looks like #96 is the reincarnation of the dead guggenheim, with curved roofs and open ground floors... could be the same team?

  • arun

    arun ·  Dec 20, 24 12:47 AM

    Very poor urban design in all of them. At least the first scheme's (Kumma) low height allows sun and water views for the existing building behind it. Why can't architects use their creativity to minimize negative impacts on the buildings around them? Maybe even make their proposals look like they "fit" in their location and context too.

    Sadly, architecture as artifact still rules.

  • ivakravitz

    ivakravitz ·  Dec 20, 24 9:26 AM

    Not to mention the total lack of landscape design on any of these. They look naked, as does the waterfront.

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Intermediate Architect

O'Neill Rose Architects

Intermediate Architect

Brooklyn, NY, US

Project Manager

The Brooklyn Studio

Project Manager

Brooklyn, NY, US

Job Captain - Residential

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Job Captain - Residential

Pleasanton, CA, US

Architectural Project Manager - Residential

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Architectural Project Manager - Residential

Pleasanton, CA, US

Job Captain / Designer

Heather Young Architects

Job Captain / Designer

Palo Alto, CA, US

Project Architect - Residential

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Project Architect - Residential

Pleasanton, CA, US

Architect

OBRA Architects

Architect

New York, NY, US

Architectural team Memeber

Meraki Architects, LLC

Architectural team Memeber

Middleburg Heights, OH, US

Hospitality Project Architect

bonetti/kozerski architecture DPC

Hospitality Project Architect

New York, NY, US

Project Architect

Pickard Architects

Project Architect

Whittier, CA, US

Next page » Loading