• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Helsinki Harbor's Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design names five shortlist teams

By Josh Niland|

Thursday, Dec 19, 2024

Photo: Sami Saastamoinen

Five finalists have been named in the competition to create the first home for the Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design in Helsinki’s South Harbor area. 

The designer’s names will remain anonymous through this stage while entries are listed by their initial number and title. A total of 624 were submitted from across the world. The 13-member jury will grant each a €50,000 ($52,000) development fee and expects to come back with the final winner's announcement by September 2025.

Beate Hølmebakk, jury panel member and partner at Manthey Kula in Oslo said: “The five finalist projects represent different visions for an inviting and inspirational museum situated on one of Helsinki’s most important sites. What these entries share is their potential to be buildings of extraordinary and lasting architectural quality. It is the jury’s opinion that they all have distinct urban presence and exceptional spatial properties that allow the new museum of architecture and design to organize the rich variety of exhibitions and events their ambition calls for. In the next phase these projects will be further developed to meet the demands for a sustainable future.”

The proposals that have advanced to stage 2 of the competition will be in development until it begins in February 2025. The shortlisted teams will have until May 2025 to make based on jury feedback.

351 Kumma

351 Kumma

Jury comments: "The new museum building has been designed as a compact and low structure, preserving important views from Tähtitorninvuori Park towards the Market Square and Katajanokka. Despite its low height, the building has a strong character. It is beautifully proportioned, with slanted, stepped walls and triangular openings that reference timeless historical themes. Unlike the other proposals, the building can be accessed from both the Market Square and Laivasillankatu sides, allowing visitors to enter directly into the ground-floor exhibition space."

486 Moby

486 Moby

Jury comments: "The proposal takes an exceptional stance on views from the site and the museum’s role as a public building alongside the blocks planned for Makasiiniranta. The new building has a wedge-shaped footprint, leaving space on the side for views from the waterfront toward Tähtitorninvuori Park. The movement of museum visitors between spaces has been carefully designed, and the views opening in different directions from the building have been thoughtfully considered. Thanks to its compact form, logical structural system, and use of recycled materials, the building is resource-efficient."

545 Tau

545 Tau

Jury comments: "The building is sculptural in its extreme simplicity. It demonstrates that to stand out from the surrounding urban fabric a landmark status can be achieved without relying on unconventional shapes, or distinctive materials. The design emphasizes the role of the new museum as an extension of the Market Square, welcoming visitor flows along its entire northern façade, which connects seamlessly to the water mirror of the Vironallas basin."

616 City Sky and Sea

616 City Sky and Sea

Jury comments: "Thanks to its curved wall and roof surfaces, the new building appears tent-like and lightweight in the waterfront landscape, where it fits naturally in front of the existing block frontage. The museum is designed with a distinctive and strong spatial structure: the exhibition spaces surrounding the central hall offer carefully selected views of the sea and the surrounding city."

96 Tyrsky

96 Tyrsky

Jury comments: "The curved-roofed building, clad entirely in green copper, blends seamlessly into the waterfront landscape and respects the existing surroundings with its moderate height. The structure consists of several rectangular interlocking volumes, creating a small inner courtyard that allows daylight to reach the center of the building. The undulating curved roof signifies that this is a public building, distinct from the neighboring blocks. The proposal is an excellent example of the use of mass timber in load-bearing structures and interior finishes."

RELATED NEWS Helsinki launches New Museum of Architecture and Design competition

Related

helsinki ● finland ● finnish architecture ● finnish museum of architecture and design ● competition ● design museum ● europe

Share

  • Follow

    7 Comments

  • reallynotmyname
    reallynotmyname

    reallynotmyname ·  Dec 19, 24 3:26 PM

    The copper one, #96 is the best by far.  

    The ones with blank walls at the ground and few to no windows upstairs look like old department stores that should be attached to a mall in the USA somewhere.


  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 5:00 PM

    Is it the same location as the aborted guggenheim?


  • Alexander Walter ·  Dec 19, 24 5:45 PM

    Are we playing GUESS THAT ARCHITECT again? Any obvious clues?

  • The_Crow
    The_Crow

    The_Crow ·  Dec 19, 24 5:52 PM

    Yep, same location as the guggenheim. Probably has the same likelihood of being realized too. 

  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 6:24 PM

    weird that this post has no thumbs up/down or reply - Looks like #96 is the reincarnation of the dead guggenheim, with curved roofs and open ground floors... could be the same team?

  • arun
    arun

    arun ·  Dec 20, 24 12:47 AM

    Very poor urban design in all of them. At least the first scheme's (Kumma) low height allows sun and water views for the existing building behind it. Why can't architects use their creativity to minimize negative impacts on the buildings around them? Maybe even make their proposals look like they "fit" in their location and context too.

    Sadly, architecture as artifact still rules.

  • ivakravitz
    ivakravitz

    ivakravitz ·  Dec 20, 24 9:26 AM

    Not to mention the total lack of landscape design on any of these. They look naked, as does the waterfront.

  • Comment as :

Helsinki Harbor's Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design names five shortlist teams

New architecture and design competitions: Tiny Houses, A' Design Award, L A M P, and Walzwerk

Studio Gang receives 2026 AIA Chicago Firm Award for ‘conceptual rigor’

Ellen Peirson wins 2026 Wheelwright Prize for kitchens as ‘mineral landscapes’

Here are the winners of the 2026 AIA Los Angeles Board of Directors Awards

A proposal reusing decommissioned buses as mobile playgrounds wins the 2026 Davidson Prize

Carlo Ratti and Park Associati to redevelop Italian hospital by linking architecture and healing

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Mujassam Watan Urban Sculpture Challenge #8 FINAL registration deadline is approaching!

Excellence in sacred architecture reflected across the 2026 Faith & Form International Awards for Religious Architecture & Art winners

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Underbridge / Edition #2 advance registration deadline is approaching!

World’s most beautiful commercial stores of 2026 selected by Prix Versailles

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Buildner’s Unbuilt Award 2026 advance registration deadline is approaching!

Eight innovative timber projects honored at 2026 Wood in Architecture Awards

Beautiful brick architecture honored at BRICK AWARD 26

Over $500,000 awarded to architectural discourse projects by Graham Foundation

Best in urban planning recognized at AIA Regional & Urban Design Award 2026

Next page » Loading

Helsinki Harbor's Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design names five shortlist teams

By Josh Niland|

Thursday, Dec 19, 2024

Share

Photo: Sami Saastamoinen

Related

helsinki ● finland ● finnish architecture ● finnish museum of architecture and design ● competition ● design museum ● europe

Five finalists have been named in the competition to create the first home for the Finnish Museum of Architecture and Design in Helsinki’s South Harbor area. 

The designer’s names will remain anonymous through this stage while entries are listed by their initial number and title. A total of 624 were submitted from across the world. The 13-member jury will grant each a €50,000 ($52,000) development fee and expects to come back with the final winner's announcement by September 2025.

Beate Hølmebakk, jury panel member and partner at Manthey Kula in Oslo said: “The five finalist projects represent different visions for an inviting and inspirational museum situated on one of Helsinki’s most important sites. What these entries share is their potential to be buildings of extraordinary and lasting architectural quality. It is the jury’s opinion that they all have distinct urban presence and exceptional spatial properties that allow the new museum of architecture and design to organize the rich variety of exhibitions and events their ambition calls for. In the next phase these projects will be further developed to meet the demands for a sustainable future.”

The proposals that have advanced to stage 2 of the competition will be in development until it begins in February 2025. The shortlisted teams will have until May 2025 to make based on jury feedback.

351 Kumma

351 Kumma

Jury comments: "The new museum building has been designed as a compact and low structure, preserving important views from Tähtitorninvuori Park towards the Market Square and Katajanokka. Despite its low height, the building has a strong character. It is beautifully proportioned, with slanted, stepped walls and triangular openings that reference timeless historical themes. Unlike the other proposals, the building can be accessed from both the Market Square and Laivasillankatu sides, allowing visitors to enter directly into the ground-floor exhibition space."

486 Moby

486 Moby

Jury comments: "The proposal takes an exceptional stance on views from the site and the museum’s role as a public building alongside the blocks planned for Makasiiniranta. The new building has a wedge-shaped footprint, leaving space on the side for views from the waterfront toward Tähtitorninvuori Park. The movement of museum visitors between spaces has been carefully designed, and the views opening in different directions from the building have been thoughtfully considered. Thanks to its compact form, logical structural system, and use of recycled materials, the building is resource-efficient."

545 Tau

545 Tau

Jury comments: "The building is sculptural in its extreme simplicity. It demonstrates that to stand out from the surrounding urban fabric a landmark status can be achieved without relying on unconventional shapes, or distinctive materials. The design emphasizes the role of the new museum as an extension of the Market Square, welcoming visitor flows along its entire northern façade, which connects seamlessly to the water mirror of the Vironallas basin."

616 City Sky and Sea

616 City Sky and Sea

Jury comments: "Thanks to its curved wall and roof surfaces, the new building appears tent-like and lightweight in the waterfront landscape, where it fits naturally in front of the existing block frontage. The museum is designed with a distinctive and strong spatial structure: the exhibition spaces surrounding the central hall offer carefully selected views of the sea and the surrounding city."

96 Tyrsky

96 Tyrsky

Jury comments: "The curved-roofed building, clad entirely in green copper, blends seamlessly into the waterfront landscape and respects the existing surroundings with its moderate height. The structure consists of several rectangular interlocking volumes, creating a small inner courtyard that allows daylight to reach the center of the building. The undulating curved roof signifies that this is a public building, distinct from the neighboring blocks. The proposal is an excellent example of the use of mass timber in load-bearing structures and interior finishes."

RELATED NEWS Helsinki launches New Museum of Architecture and Design competition

Share

  • Follow

    7 Comments

  • reallynotmyname

    reallynotmyname ·  Dec 19, 24 3:26 PM

    The copper one, #96 is the best by far.  

    The ones with blank walls at the ground and few to no windows upstairs look like old department stores that should be attached to a mall in the USA somewhere.


  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 5:00 PM

    Is it the same location as the aborted guggenheim?


  • Alexander Walter ·  Dec 19, 24 5:45 PM

    Are we playing GUESS THAT ARCHITECT again? Any obvious clues?

  • The_Crow

    The_Crow ·  Dec 19, 24 5:52 PM

    Yep, same location as the guggenheim. Probably has the same likelihood of being realized too. 

  • Juan Lagarrigue ·  Dec 19, 24 6:24 PM

    weird that this post has no thumbs up/down or reply - Looks like #96 is the reincarnation of the dead guggenheim, with curved roofs and open ground floors... could be the same team?

  • arun

    arun ·  Dec 20, 24 12:47 AM

    Very poor urban design in all of them. At least the first scheme's (Kumma) low height allows sun and water views for the existing building behind it. Why can't architects use their creativity to minimize negative impacts on the buildings around them? Maybe even make their proposals look like they "fit" in their location and context too.

    Sadly, architecture as artifact still rules.

  • ivakravitz

    ivakravitz ·  Dec 20, 24 9:26 AM

    Not to mention the total lack of landscape design on any of these. They look naked, as does the waterfront.

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Architect/Architectural Designer

ET Boggess Architects, Inc.

Architect/Architectural Designer

Princeton, WV, US

Intermediate Architect - Retail (AutoCAD-based)

O'Neil Langan Architects

Intermediate Architect - Retail (AutoCAD-based)

New York, NY, US

Project Designer

Mammoth

Project Designer

Brooklyn, NY, US

Project Architect

Studio AR&D Architects

Project Architect

Los Angeles, CA, US

Project Designer / Manager

BuiltIN Studio

Project Designer / Manager

New York, NY, US

Part-time Faculty, School of Architecture

The University of Tennessee - Knoxville

Part-time Faculty, School of Architecture

Knoxville, TN, US

Architect

KieranTimberlake

Architect

Philadelphia, PA, US

Project Manager - Civic/Community

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Project Manager - Civic/Community

Irvine, CA, US

Studio Operations Manager

Obata Noblin Office

Studio Operations Manager

San Francisco, CA, US

Senior Architectural Designer, Commercial Interiors - Boston Office

Fogarty Finger

Senior Architectural Designer, Commercial Interiors - Boston Office

Boston, MA, US

Next page » Loading