• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Finalists Announced for Queens Wharf

By Bustler Editors|

Wednesday, Sep 30, 2009

After thorough evaluation and assessment, five designs have been selected from the 237 original entries. View the finalists (design numbers 024, 046, 170, 195 and 216) in more detail below.

The Finalists

Design number 024 - Andrius Gedgaudas, Architect, Shanghai China.

image

The design offers a simple and strong public realm experience, with the potential for activities and uses beneath the inclined platform to be well related to adjacent public open spaces. Despite the stark simplicity of the proposal, the design would offer significant scope for the addition of other elements as patterns of use on Queens Wharf evolve over time. The contoured landscape feature will require further consideration in relation to the need for adaptable and robust event spaces. However, an abstract reinterpretation of landform which also accommodates everyday use and larger gatherings may be possible.

Design number 046 - Den Aitken, Pete Griffith and Hamish Foote, Field Landscape Architecture, Auckland.

image

The panel considered that although highly schematic, the submission presented a design approach with considerable potential. However, the proposal would need to be carefully developed and tested in response to the Stage 2 design brief. The basis for the proposed undulations within the promenade would need to be reviewed and clarified in the Stage 2 submission.

Design number 170 - David Gibbs and Aaron Sills, Construkt / SVB, Auckland.

image

The design establishes a major public open space across the full width of the northern portion of Queens Wharf, capable of being configured in a variety of ways. The panel questioned the proposal to partially enclose this space with structures comprising curved ribs and the proposal for an “urban beach” beyond the northern end of the wharf. The panel noted the variety of spatial conditions developed in a transverse east-west direction, and the potential to organize these in a sequential manner, in order to encourage pedestrian movement along the length of the wharf.

Design number 195 - John Coop, Tasman Studio, Auckland.

image

The proposal demonstrates how redevelopment of the wharf might positively inter-relate existing and new buildings. Building forms are bold and simple, and respond well to the scale and drama of the wharf and its setting.

Design number 216 - Simon Williams, Williams Architects Ltd, Auckland.

image

A covered pedestrian walkway extends for the length of the wharf, skirting the western face of the terminal building with opportunities to develop active edges. This walkway has been duplicated at an upper level and extends southwards to Customs Street. The panel questioned the merits of this feature, and of the water feature that extends the length of the wharf. The panel commended the use of simple sculptural forms for the terminal and the way in which the space at the northern end of the wharf connected to the water and engaged with the harbor setting.

View full details on the competition website

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Finalists Announced for Queens Wharf

Northwestern University selects 12-firm longlist to design new engineering building

New architecture and design competitions: Exploring 130 Years of American Design, Christo & Jeanne-Claude Center, 13 White Houses, and La Pyramide

Micro-architecture honored in latest Tiny House Architecture Competition

World’s most beautiful restaurants of 2026 chosen by Prix Versailles

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a wine tasting room in Italy! Valli Wine Tasting Room is launched!

10 can't-miss architecture & design events to see this June in London, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Detroit, San Diego, Porto, and Barcelona

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Museum of Emotions / Edition #8 FINAL registration deadline is approaching!

Seven global projects make AR Public Awards shortlist 2026

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a slow-living restaurant in Portugal! Portugal Long Table Restaurant is launched!

World's best tall buildings honored at the CVU 2026 Award of Excellence

Sponsored Post by TWOPAGES

Final call: TWOPAGES X Design Contest 2026 submissions close June 5

Kengo Kuma & Paul Raff win Alberta national park visitor center competition with landscape-focused design

2026 Moira Gemmill and MJ Long prizes announced by W Awards

New architecture and design competitions: Kinderspace, Stewardson Keefe LeBrun Travel Grant, SMALL PROJECT BIG IMPACT, and Garden of University House, Bucharest

The Century of Gehry: New retrospective explores the late architect's work & collaborations

Next page » Loading

Finalists Announced for Queens Wharf

By Bustler Editors|

Wednesday, Sep 30, 2009

Share

After thorough evaluation and assessment, five designs have been selected from the 237 original entries. View the finalists (design numbers 024, 046, 170, 195 and 216) in more detail below.

The Finalists

Design number 024 - Andrius Gedgaudas, Architect, Shanghai China.

image

The design offers a simple and strong public realm experience, with the potential for activities and uses beneath the inclined platform to be well related to adjacent public open spaces. Despite the stark simplicity of the proposal, the design would offer significant scope for the addition of other elements as patterns of use on Queens Wharf evolve over time. The contoured landscape feature will require further consideration in relation to the need for adaptable and robust event spaces. However, an abstract reinterpretation of landform which also accommodates everyday use and larger gatherings may be possible.

Design number 046 - Den Aitken, Pete Griffith and Hamish Foote, Field Landscape Architecture, Auckland.

image

The panel considered that although highly schematic, the submission presented a design approach with considerable potential. However, the proposal would need to be carefully developed and tested in response to the Stage 2 design brief. The basis for the proposed undulations within the promenade would need to be reviewed and clarified in the Stage 2 submission.

Design number 170 - David Gibbs and Aaron Sills, Construkt / SVB, Auckland.

image

The design establishes a major public open space across the full width of the northern portion of Queens Wharf, capable of being configured in a variety of ways. The panel questioned the proposal to partially enclose this space with structures comprising curved ribs and the proposal for an “urban beach” beyond the northern end of the wharf. The panel noted the variety of spatial conditions developed in a transverse east-west direction, and the potential to organize these in a sequential manner, in order to encourage pedestrian movement along the length of the wharf.

Design number 195 - John Coop, Tasman Studio, Auckland.

image

The proposal demonstrates how redevelopment of the wharf might positively inter-relate existing and new buildings. Building forms are bold and simple, and respond well to the scale and drama of the wharf and its setting.

Design number 216 - Simon Williams, Williams Architects Ltd, Auckland.

image

A covered pedestrian walkway extends for the length of the wharf, skirting the western face of the terminal building with opportunities to develop active edges. This walkway has been duplicated at an upper level and extends southwards to Customs Street. The panel questioned the merits of this feature, and of the water feature that extends the length of the wharf. The panel commended the use of simple sculptural forms for the terminal and the way in which the space at the northern end of the wharf connected to the water and engaged with the harbor setting.

View full details on the competition website

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Design Architect

JLK Architects

Design Architect

Chicago, IL, US

Project Architect/Job Captain

HLW International LLP

Project Architect/Job Captain

West Palm Beach, FL, US

Marketing Coordinator

Blair + Mui Dowd Architects

Marketing Coordinator

New York, NY, US

Intermediate Architect

IMC Architecture

Intermediate Architect

Brooklyn, NY, US

AutoCAD Drafter/Architectural Designer

Kari Whitman Interiors

AutoCAD Drafter/Architectural Designer

Boulder, CO, US

Project Architect

BuildingWork

Project Architect

Seattle, WA, US

Junior Architect

PRDG architecture + design

Junior Architect

New York, NY, US

Junior Architect

Eric Colbert & Associates

Junior Architect

Washington, DC, US

Intermediate Designer - 3+ Years Experience (NY)

Cass Calder Smith

Intermediate Designer - 3+ Years Experience (NY)

New York, NY, US

Senior Designer / Architect

NardiHaus

Senior Designer / Architect

Pasadena, CA, US

Next page » Loading