• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

By Bustler Editors|

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Detail from First Prize-winning proposal by Quang Le and Lien Hoang Phuong

Architects are always searching for new ways to integrate buildings into a natural environment in the most seamless way possible, as seen in the results of the third edition of OPENGAP's INNATUR: Nature Interpretation Center.

Participants in the open ideas competition had to come up with new, minimally disruptive strategies to implement architecture into a natural environment.

From 133 submitted proposals all the way down to nine finalists, the jury selected three prize winners and six honorable mentions.

This year's jury featured: Javier Sánchez (Architect), Alexander Von Agerer (Architect, proxy to Sánchez), Juan Carral O ́Gorman (Architect), and Ulises Omar Zuñiga (Archtect)

Have a look at all the winning proposals and some jury comments below.

First prize winners: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)
First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

Highlights of the jury: "A proposal with a very clear and strong concept. The project goes beyond romantic visions of nature as something independent of human beings. It is a reflection on the role of man in transforming their environment and nature as a concept that originates in specific cultural contexts. Being located above one of the largest human intervention in nature, the project focuses on showing not only the beauty of nature but also about the human desire for power and control and intervene to nature. The concept becomes stronger with the selection of a basic material like concrete and the use of the existing structure avoiding new damage to nature."

Second prize winners: Frida Boström, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)
Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Highlights of the jury: "A project with a distinct, fine and interesting proposal. The project is itself an interpretation of nature, not a site for your interpretation. It is a proposal that successfully invites to think of architecture as an exercise of spatialization of human experience in a broad sense. Rather than setting a large building in the middle of nature the project is based in a set of several small interventions. From a building that provides information on the city center and connects the city to the nature reserve. The project only helps and promotes the experience and interpretation of nature without forcing the visitors to anything."

Third prize winners: José Manuel Rodríguez Dávila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)
Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Highlights of the jury: "The formal proposal takes literally the invitation to interpret the nature: The building form of the building imitates the environment. Thus, the building is a mimetic exercise that reduces the scale and complexity of the landscape to allow better understanding. This is a sensible proposal that is well integrated to the site. Adopting a buried vernacular design and working with patios, the project achieves interesting spaces that promise a functional interpretation center of nature. With the selection of materials and shapes, the building achieves a good dialogue with the site."

Images courtesy of INNATUR 3 competition

For the honorable mentions, click through the thumbnails below.

Related

results ● opengap ● nature ● integrative design ● innatur 3 ● innatur ● ideas competition ● environmental design

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

Micro-architecture honored in latest Tiny House Architecture Competition

World’s most beautiful restaurants of 2026 chosen by Prix Versailles

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a wine tasting room in Italy! Valli Wine Tasting Room is launched!

10 can't-miss architecture & design events to see this June in London, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, Detroit, San Diego, Porto, and Barcelona

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Museum of Emotions / Edition #8 FINAL registration deadline is approaching!

Seven global projects make AR Public Awards shortlist 2026

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a slow-living restaurant in Portugal! Portugal Long Table Restaurant is launched!

World's best tall buildings honored at the CVU 2026 Award of Excellence

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Sponsored Post by TWOPAGES

Final call: TWOPAGES X Design Contest 2026 submissions close June 5

Kengo Kuma & Paul Raff win Alberta national park visitor center competition with landscape-focused design

2026 Moira Gemmill and MJ Long prizes announced by W Awards

New architecture and design competitions: Kinderspace, Stewardson Keefe LeBrun Travel Grant, SMALL PROJECT BIG IMPACT, and Garden of University House, Bucharest

The Century of Gehry: New retrospective explores the late architect's work & collaborations

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Rome Rain Rooms FINAL registration deadline is in 5 DAYS!

UIA and UN Habitat unveil sustainability-focused winners for UIA 2030 Award

Next page » Loading

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

By Bustler Editors|

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Share

Detail from First Prize-winning proposal by Quang Le and Lien Hoang Phuong

Related

results ● opengap ● nature ● integrative design ● innatur 3 ● innatur ● ideas competition ● environmental design

Architects are always searching for new ways to integrate buildings into a natural environment in the most seamless way possible, as seen in the results of the third edition of OPENGAP's INNATUR: Nature Interpretation Center.

Participants in the open ideas competition had to come up with new, minimally disruptive strategies to implement architecture into a natural environment.

From 133 submitted proposals all the way down to nine finalists, the jury selected three prize winners and six honorable mentions.

This year's jury featured: Javier Sánchez (Architect), Alexander Von Agerer (Architect, proxy to Sánchez), Juan Carral O ́Gorman (Architect), and Ulises Omar Zuñiga (Archtect)

Have a look at all the winning proposals and some jury comments below.

First prize winners: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)
First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

Highlights of the jury: "A proposal with a very clear and strong concept. The project goes beyond romantic visions of nature as something independent of human beings. It is a reflection on the role of man in transforming their environment and nature as a concept that originates in specific cultural contexts. Being located above one of the largest human intervention in nature, the project focuses on showing not only the beauty of nature but also about the human desire for power and control and intervene to nature. The concept becomes stronger with the selection of a basic material like concrete and the use of the existing structure avoiding new damage to nature."

Second prize winners: Frida Boström, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)
Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Highlights of the jury: "A project with a distinct, fine and interesting proposal. The project is itself an interpretation of nature, not a site for your interpretation. It is a proposal that successfully invites to think of architecture as an exercise of spatialization of human experience in a broad sense. Rather than setting a large building in the middle of nature the project is based in a set of several small interventions. From a building that provides information on the city center and connects the city to the nature reserve. The project only helps and promotes the experience and interpretation of nature without forcing the visitors to anything."

Third prize winners: José Manuel Rodríguez Dávila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)
Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Highlights of the jury: "The formal proposal takes literally the invitation to interpret the nature: The building form of the building imitates the environment. Thus, the building is a mimetic exercise that reduces the scale and complexity of the landscape to allow better understanding. This is a sensible proposal that is well integrated to the site. Adopting a buried vernacular design and working with patios, the project achieves interesting spaces that promise a functional interpretation center of nature. With the selection of materials and shapes, the building achieves a good dialogue with the site."

Images courtesy of INNATUR 3 competition

For the honorable mentions, click through the thumbnails below.

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Project Designer (3-5 years)

Edmonds + Lee Architects

Project Designer (3-5 years)

San Francisco, CA, US

Intermediate Architect

NDKazalas Architecture PC

Intermediate Architect

New York, NY, US

Project Architect / Senior Designer

Touloukian Touloukian Inc.

Project Architect / Senior Designer

Boston, MA, US

Intermediate Architectural Designer

David Smotrich & Partners LLP

Intermediate Architectural Designer

New York, NY, US

High-End Single-Family Residential Project Designer (6-8 years experience)

LUNO Design Studio

High-End Single-Family Residential Project Designer (6-8 years experience)

Los Angeles, CA, US

Project Designer / Job Captain

Solutions Architecture Corp

Project Designer / Job Captain

Verona, NJ, US

Job Captain

Ana Williamson Architect

Job Captain

Menlo Park, CA, US

Project Architect/Job Captain

HLW International LLP

Project Architect/Job Captain

West Palm Beach, FL, US

Office Assistant / Studio Coordinator

Beinfield Architecture PC

Office Assistant / Studio Coordinator

Norwalk, CT, US

Interior Designer, 5+ Years Experience

Cass Calder Smith

Interior Designer, 5+ Years Experience

San Francisco, CA, US

Next page » Loading