• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

By Bustler Editors|

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Detail from First Prize-winning proposal by Quang Le and Lien Hoang Phuong

Architects are always searching for new ways to integrate buildings into a natural environment in the most seamless way possible, as seen in the results of the third edition of OPENGAP's INNATUR: Nature Interpretation Center.

Participants in the open ideas competition had to come up with new, minimally disruptive strategies to implement architecture into a natural environment.

From 133 submitted proposals all the way down to nine finalists, the jury selected three prize winners and six honorable mentions.

This year's jury featured: Javier Sánchez (Architect), Alexander Von Agerer (Architect, proxy to Sánchez), Juan Carral O ́Gorman (Architect), and Ulises Omar Zuñiga (Archtect)

Have a look at all the winning proposals and some jury comments below.

First prize winners: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)
First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

Highlights of the jury: "A proposal with a very clear and strong concept. The project goes beyond romantic visions of nature as something independent of human beings. It is a reflection on the role of man in transforming their environment and nature as a concept that originates in specific cultural contexts. Being located above one of the largest human intervention in nature, the project focuses on showing not only the beauty of nature but also about the human desire for power and control and intervene to nature. The concept becomes stronger with the selection of a basic material like concrete and the use of the existing structure avoiding new damage to nature."

Second prize winners: Frida Boström, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)
Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Highlights of the jury: "A project with a distinct, fine and interesting proposal. The project is itself an interpretation of nature, not a site for your interpretation. It is a proposal that successfully invites to think of architecture as an exercise of spatialization of human experience in a broad sense. Rather than setting a large building in the middle of nature the project is based in a set of several small interventions. From a building that provides information on the city center and connects the city to the nature reserve. The project only helps and promotes the experience and interpretation of nature without forcing the visitors to anything."

Third prize winners: José Manuel Rodríguez Dávila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)
Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Highlights of the jury: "The formal proposal takes literally the invitation to interpret the nature: The building form of the building imitates the environment. Thus, the building is a mimetic exercise that reduces the scale and complexity of the landscape to allow better understanding. This is a sensible proposal that is well integrated to the site. Adopting a buried vernacular design and working with patios, the project achieves interesting spaces that promise a functional interpretation center of nature. With the selection of materials and shapes, the building achieves a good dialogue with the site."

Images courtesy of INNATUR 3 competition

For the honorable mentions, click through the thumbnails below.

Related

results ● opengap ● nature ● integrative design ● innatur 3 ● innatur ● ideas competition ● environmental design

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

Eight innovative timber projects honored at 2026 Wood in Architecture Awards

Beautiful brick architecture honored at BRICK AWARD 26

Over $500,000 awarded to architectural discourse projects by Graham Foundation

Best in urban planning recognized at AIA Regional & Urban Design Award 2026

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Re:Form - New Life for Old Spaces / Edition #3 advance registration deadline is approaching!

New architecture and design competitions: IDEAS Awards, UIA-HYP CUP International Student Competition, Vancouver Tall Challenge, and Memorial to the Sixth Extinction

Best small projects chosen at AIA Small Project Award 2026

10 standout sustainable projects honored at AIA COTE Top Ten Award 2026

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Best residential architecture of 2026 honored at AIA Housing Award

Best new interiors of 2026 chosen at AIA Interior Architecture Awards

Best global architecture honored at RIBA International Awards 2026

World’s most beautiful airports of 2026 chosen by Prix Versailles

New architecture and design competitions: Brick in Architecture Awards, Study Architecture Student Showcase, N.Y.C. Groceries, and New York High Falls Riverfront Market

SmithGroup’s ‘pioneering’ Philip Merrill Environmental Center wins AIA Twenty-five Year Award

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Museum of Emotions / Edition #8 FINAL registration deadline is in 5 DAYS!

Next page » Loading

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

By Bustler Editors|

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Share

Detail from First Prize-winning proposal by Quang Le and Lien Hoang Phuong

Related

results ● opengap ● nature ● integrative design ● innatur 3 ● innatur ● ideas competition ● environmental design

Architects are always searching for new ways to integrate buildings into a natural environment in the most seamless way possible, as seen in the results of the third edition of OPENGAP's INNATUR: Nature Interpretation Center.

Participants in the open ideas competition had to come up with new, minimally disruptive strategies to implement architecture into a natural environment.

From 133 submitted proposals all the way down to nine finalists, the jury selected three prize winners and six honorable mentions.

This year's jury featured: Javier Sánchez (Architect), Alexander Von Agerer (Architect, proxy to Sánchez), Juan Carral O ́Gorman (Architect), and Ulises Omar Zuñiga (Archtect)

Have a look at all the winning proposals and some jury comments below.

First prize winners: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)
First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

Highlights of the jury: "A proposal with a very clear and strong concept. The project goes beyond romantic visions of nature as something independent of human beings. It is a reflection on the role of man in transforming their environment and nature as a concept that originates in specific cultural contexts. Being located above one of the largest human intervention in nature, the project focuses on showing not only the beauty of nature but also about the human desire for power and control and intervene to nature. The concept becomes stronger with the selection of a basic material like concrete and the use of the existing structure avoiding new damage to nature."

Second prize winners: Frida Boström, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)
Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Highlights of the jury: "A project with a distinct, fine and interesting proposal. The project is itself an interpretation of nature, not a site for your interpretation. It is a proposal that successfully invites to think of architecture as an exercise of spatialization of human experience in a broad sense. Rather than setting a large building in the middle of nature the project is based in a set of several small interventions. From a building that provides information on the city center and connects the city to the nature reserve. The project only helps and promotes the experience and interpretation of nature without forcing the visitors to anything."

Third prize winners: José Manuel Rodríguez Dávila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)
Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Highlights of the jury: "The formal proposal takes literally the invitation to interpret the nature: The building form of the building imitates the environment. Thus, the building is a mimetic exercise that reduces the scale and complexity of the landscape to allow better understanding. This is a sensible proposal that is well integrated to the site. Adopting a buried vernacular design and working with patios, the project achieves interesting spaces that promise a functional interpretation center of nature. With the selection of materials and shapes, the building achieves a good dialogue with the site."

Images courtesy of INNATUR 3 competition

For the honorable mentions, click through the thumbnails below.

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Executive Assistant & Office Manager To Principal

Danny Forster & Architecture

Executive Assistant & Office Manager To Principal

New York, NY, US

Assistant Professor Architecture

California State Polytechnic University, Pomona

Assistant Professor Architecture

Pomona, CA, US

Miami Senior Project Coordinator

BMA Architects

Miami Senior Project Coordinator

Miami, FL, US

Project Designer / Job Captain

Kadre Architects, Inc

Project Designer / Job Captain

Los Angeles, CA, US

Senior Associate/ Project Manager

DWY Landscape Architects

Senior Associate/ Project Manager

Sarasota, FL, US

Intermediate Architectural Designer, Ground-Up - New York Office

Fogarty Finger

Intermediate Architectural Designer, Ground-Up - New York Office

New York, NY, US

Project Manager - Planning

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Project Manager - Planning

Pleasanton, CA, US

Intermediate Architect

GF55 Architects

Intermediate Architect

New York, NY, US

Project Manager

Populous

Project Manager

San Francisco, CA, US

Studio Coordinator

Sarah Jacoby Architect

Studio Coordinator

Long Island City, NY, US

Next page » Loading