• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

By Bustler Editors|

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Detail from First Prize-winning proposal by Quang Le and Lien Hoang Phuong

Architects are always searching for new ways to integrate buildings into a natural environment in the most seamless way possible, as seen in the results of the third edition of OPENGAP's INNATUR: Nature Interpretation Center.

Participants in the open ideas competition had to come up with new, minimally disruptive strategies to implement architecture into a natural environment.

From 133 submitted proposals all the way down to nine finalists, the jury selected three prize winners and six honorable mentions.

This year's jury featured: Javier Sánchez (Architect), Alexander Von Agerer (Architect, proxy to Sánchez), Juan Carral O ́Gorman (Architect), and Ulises Omar Zuñiga (Archtect)

Have a look at all the winning proposals and some jury comments below.

First prize winners: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)
First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

Highlights of the jury: "A proposal with a very clear and strong concept. The project goes beyond romantic visions of nature as something independent of human beings. It is a reflection on the role of man in transforming their environment and nature as a concept that originates in specific cultural contexts. Being located above one of the largest human intervention in nature, the project focuses on showing not only the beauty of nature but also about the human desire for power and control and intervene to nature. The concept becomes stronger with the selection of a basic material like concrete and the use of the existing structure avoiding new damage to nature."

Second prize winners: Frida Boström, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)
Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Highlights of the jury: "A project with a distinct, fine and interesting proposal. The project is itself an interpretation of nature, not a site for your interpretation. It is a proposal that successfully invites to think of architecture as an exercise of spatialization of human experience in a broad sense. Rather than setting a large building in the middle of nature the project is based in a set of several small interventions. From a building that provides information on the city center and connects the city to the nature reserve. The project only helps and promotes the experience and interpretation of nature without forcing the visitors to anything."

Third prize winners: José Manuel Rodríguez Dávila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)
Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Highlights of the jury: "The formal proposal takes literally the invitation to interpret the nature: The building form of the building imitates the environment. Thus, the building is a mimetic exercise that reduces the scale and complexity of the landscape to allow better understanding. This is a sensible proposal that is well integrated to the site. Adopting a buried vernacular design and working with patios, the project achieves interesting spaces that promise a functional interpretation center of nature. With the selection of materials and shapes, the building achieves a good dialogue with the site."

Images courtesy of INNATUR 3 competition

For the honorable mentions, click through the thumbnails below.

Related

results ● opengap ● nature ● integrative design ● innatur 3 ● innatur ● ideas competition ● environmental design

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

Six projects make 2026 Stirling Prize shortlist for UK’s best new building

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Mujassam Watan Urban Sculpture Challenge #8 FINAL registration deadline is in 5 DAYS!

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design the future of Vancouver’s skyline. Vancouver Tall Challenge is launched!

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design an observation tower in Latvia. The Quiet Tower is launched!

The Architect’s Chair competition: 5th edition reveals winning designs

UK’s best new architecture honored at 2026 RIBA National Awards

World Architecture Festival: Explore the shortlisted finalists for 2026

New architecture and design competitions: Tiny Houses, A' Design Award, L A M P, and Walzwerk

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Studio Gang receives 2026 AIA Chicago Firm Award for ‘conceptual rigor’

Ellen Peirson wins 2026 Wheelwright Prize for kitchens as ‘mineral landscapes’

Here are the winners of the 2026 AIA Los Angeles Board of Directors Awards

A proposal reusing decommissioned buses as mobile playgrounds wins the 2026 Davidson Prize

Carlo Ratti and Park Associati to redevelop Italian hospital by linking architecture and healing

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Mujassam Watan Urban Sculpture Challenge #8 FINAL registration deadline is approaching!

Excellence in sacred architecture reflected across the 2026 Faith & Form International Awards for Religious Architecture & Art winners

Next page » Loading

Winners of INNATUR 3 propose fresh ideas of blending architecture and nature

By Bustler Editors|

Thursday, May 29, 2014

Share

Detail from First Prize-winning proposal by Quang Le and Lien Hoang Phuong

Related

results ● opengap ● nature ● integrative design ● innatur 3 ● innatur ● ideas competition ● environmental design

Architects are always searching for new ways to integrate buildings into a natural environment in the most seamless way possible, as seen in the results of the third edition of OPENGAP's INNATUR: Nature Interpretation Center.

Participants in the open ideas competition had to come up with new, minimally disruptive strategies to implement architecture into a natural environment.

From 133 submitted proposals all the way down to nine finalists, the jury selected three prize winners and six honorable mentions.

This year's jury featured: Javier Sánchez (Architect), Alexander Von Agerer (Architect, proxy to Sánchez), Juan Carral O ́Gorman (Architect), and Ulises Omar Zuñiga (Archtect)

Have a look at all the winning proposals and some jury comments below.

First prize winners: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)
First prize: Quang Le, Lien Hoang Phuong (Switzerland/Vietnam)

Highlights of the jury: "A proposal with a very clear and strong concept. The project goes beyond romantic visions of nature as something independent of human beings. It is a reflection on the role of man in transforming their environment and nature as a concept that originates in specific cultural contexts. Being located above one of the largest human intervention in nature, the project focuses on showing not only the beauty of nature but also about the human desire for power and control and intervene to nature. The concept becomes stronger with the selection of a basic material like concrete and the use of the existing structure avoiding new damage to nature."

Second prize winners: Frida Boström, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)
Second prize winners: Frida Bostro?m, Marika Lundberg (Sweden)

Highlights of the jury: "A project with a distinct, fine and interesting proposal. The project is itself an interpretation of nature, not a site for your interpretation. It is a proposal that successfully invites to think of architecture as an exercise of spatialization of human experience in a broad sense. Rather than setting a large building in the middle of nature the project is based in a set of several small interventions. From a building that provides information on the city center and connects the city to the nature reserve. The project only helps and promotes the experience and interpretation of nature without forcing the visitors to anything."

Third prize winners: José Manuel Rodríguez Dávila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)
Third prize winners: Jose? Manuel Rodri?guez Da?vila, Carolina Turmo Olivie (Spain)

Highlights of the jury: "The formal proposal takes literally the invitation to interpret the nature: The building form of the building imitates the environment. Thus, the building is a mimetic exercise that reduces the scale and complexity of the landscape to allow better understanding. This is a sensible proposal that is well integrated to the site. Adopting a buried vernacular design and working with patios, the project achieves interesting spaces that promise a functional interpretation center of nature. With the selection of materials and shapes, the building achieves a good dialogue with the site."

Images courtesy of INNATUR 3 competition

For the honorable mentions, click through the thumbnails below.

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Designer

HATCH ARCHITECTURE

Designer

Los Angeles, CA, US

Job Captain

Michael Maltzan Architecture

Job Captain

Los Angeles, CA, US

Intermediate Architect - Retail (AutoCAD-based)

O'Neil Langan Architects

Intermediate Architect - Retail (AutoCAD-based)

New York, NY, US

Specifications Writer

LMN

Specifications Writer

Seattle, WA, US

Project Manager

Cardello Architects

Project Manager

Westport, CT, US

Intermediate Architect

James Wagman Architect, LLC

Intermediate Architect

New York, NY, US

Job Captain / Project Coordinator

HATCH ARCHITECTURE

Job Captain / Project Coordinator

Los Angeles, CA, US

Intermediate Interior Designer

Alchemy Studio

Intermediate Interior Designer

Brooklyn, NY, US

Project Architect

Studio AR&D Architects

Project Architect

Los Angeles, CA, US

Job Captain / Architectural Designer (4-6 Years’ Experience)

Millan Architect / Studio Inc.

Job Captain / Architectural Designer (4-6 Years’ Experience)

Venice, CA, US

Next page » Loading