• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join
Tagged: coworking

Winning results of the Urban Zoo Coworking Space competition

By Justine Testado|

Friday, Mar 8, 2019

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

The Urban Zoo Coworking Space design competition challenged entrants to create a unique interior concept for a new chain of coworking spaces planning to launch their first location in the heart of Latvia’s capital city of Riga. 

In evaluating the submissions, the jury focused on the quality, versatility, and adaptability of the designs, as well as their dedication to creating a distinct, recognizable interior identity. 

The competition concluded with three prize winners and six honorable mentions. Scroll down for a glimpse of the top three prize winners.

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

Jury commentary: “The Menagerie project features a modern and coherent color scheme that was eye catching, inviting, and incredibly stylised. It really complimented the concept of an ‘urban zoo’, creating an energetic atmosphere in which workers could connect, exchange, and collaborate. The submitted designs offered a clear and understandable concept that included an uncomplicated scheme of forms, shapes, and colors that complimented the furniture. And while unique, the scheme could easily be replicated in any type of space and has the potential to become the signature interior for the Urban Zoo Coworking brand.”

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.

Jury commentary: “WILD took modular design to the next level, with its “Kit of Parts” enabling users to customise their work space towards either individual, isolated work, or fostering collaboration and networking within the space. The project really played well with the theme of a zoo environment, exploring varying levels of exposure established through the lightweight framework of its modular system. The jury selected this project as a runner-up because the highly-functional proposed grid system showed extreme originality and ingenuity, offering a variety of different types of working spaces, presentation platforms, and storage areas. And while the design has great potential in becoming a part of the Urban Zoo Coworking bran, the jury did have slight concerns about the practicalities of the structure installation, maintenance, and cost.”

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.

Jury commentary: “The Habitat project is one of the few conventional designs, with a straightforward color scheme of natural wood and plants to create a habitat where creatives could escape the rat race. The jury panel especially complimented the smart and coherent approach to zoning, with different areas being defined as settlements, nests, and jungles, each constructed by a unique arrangement of modular units. The selection of the modular furniture, as well as the overall level of the concept detail, made for a compelling and intriguing working environment.”

You can check out the winning results in more detail here.

All images courtesy of Bee Breeders Architecture Competitions.

RELATED COMPETITION Urban Zoo Coworking Design Challenge

Related

urban zoo coworking design challenge ● coworking ● office design ● ideas competition ● bee breeders architecture competition ● bee breeders ● competition ● interior design

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Winning results of the Urban Zoo Coworking Space competition

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

A Coworking Interior Design Challenge To Let The Imagination Run Wild. Final Registration Deadline Approaching!

Sponsored Post by Bee Breeders

A Coworking Interior Design Challenge To Let The Imagination Run Wild

10 DESIGN to develop 55,000m2 Jinwan Aviation Research + Development Center in China

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Next page » Loading

Winning results of the Urban Zoo Coworking Space competition

By Justine Testado|

Friday, Mar 8, 2019

Share

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

Related

urban zoo coworking design challenge ● coworking ● office design ● ideas competition ● bee breeders architecture competition ● bee breeders ● competition ● interior design

The Urban Zoo Coworking Space design competition challenged entrants to create a unique interior concept for a new chain of coworking spaces planning to launch their first location in the heart of Latvia’s capital city of Riga. 

In evaluating the submissions, the jury focused on the quality, versatility, and adaptability of the designs, as well as their dedication to creating a distinct, recognizable interior identity. 

The competition concluded with three prize winners and six honorable mentions. Scroll down for a glimpse of the top three prize winners.

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France

1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.
1ST PLACE: “The Menagerie” by STUDIO MAS - Marianne Ventre, Anthony Spennato | France.

Jury commentary: “The Menagerie project features a modern and coherent color scheme that was eye catching, inviting, and incredibly stylised. It really complimented the concept of an ‘urban zoo’, creating an energetic atmosphere in which workers could connect, exchange, and collaborate. The submitted designs offered a clear and understandable concept that included an uncomplicated scheme of forms, shapes, and colors that complimented the furniture. And while unique, the scheme could easily be replicated in any type of space and has the potential to become the signature interior for the Urban Zoo Coworking brand.”

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia

2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.
2ND PLACE: “WILD” by CORNERSTORE - Rachel Fay, Liv Green | Australia.

Jury commentary: “WILD took modular design to the next level, with its “Kit of Parts” enabling users to customise their work space towards either individual, isolated work, or fostering collaboration and networking within the space. The project really played well with the theme of a zoo environment, exploring varying levels of exposure established through the lightweight framework of its modular system. The jury selected this project as a runner-up because the highly-functional proposed grid system showed extreme originality and ingenuity, offering a variety of different types of working spaces, presentation platforms, and storage areas. And while the design has great potential in becoming a part of the Urban Zoo Coworking bran, the jury did have slight concerns about the practicalities of the structure installation, maintenance, and cost.”

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation

3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.
3RD PLACE: “Habitat” by APEX PROJECT BUREAU - Darya Khrenova, Ekaterina Zakharova, Ilyas Belyaev | Russian Federation.

Jury commentary: “The Habitat project is one of the few conventional designs, with a straightforward color scheme of natural wood and plants to create a habitat where creatives could escape the rat race. The jury panel especially complimented the smart and coherent approach to zoning, with different areas being defined as settlements, nests, and jungles, each constructed by a unique arrangement of modular units. The selection of the modular furniture, as well as the overall level of the concept detail, made for a compelling and intriguing working environment.”

You can check out the winning results in more detail here.

All images courtesy of Bee Breeders Architecture Competitions.

RELATED COMPETITION Urban Zoo Coworking Design Challenge

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Junior Designer/Architect

O'Neill Rose Architects

Junior Designer/Architect

Brooklyn, NY, US

Architecture & Design Manager

7th Street Burger

Architecture & Design Manager

New York, NY, US

Project Manager - Planning

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Project Manager - Planning

Pleasanton, CA, US

Senior Architectural Planner

Payette

Senior Architectural Planner

Boston, MA, US

Digital Futures Fellow

The University of Tennessee - Knoxville

Digital Futures Fellow

Knoxville, TN, US

Project Manager/Designer

BOTO Design Architects

Project Manager/Designer

Santa Monica, CA, US

Project Architect

Fowlkes Studio

Project Architect

Washington, DC, US

Project Designer / Manager

BuiltIN Studio

Project Designer / Manager

New York, NY, US

Design Technologist / BIM Lead

The American Housing Corporation

Design Technologist / BIM Lead

Austin, TX, US

Architectural Project Manager - Residential

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Architectural Project Manager - Residential

Pleasanton, CA, US

Next page » Loading