• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

Three Winning A101 Block City Entries by de Architekten Cie/SVESMI

By Bustler Editors|

Tuesday, Jan 4, 2011

Tower Block, Winner High Density - Perspective

The joint venture of Amsterdam-based de Architekten Cie. (Frits van Dongen, Patrick Koschuch and Jason Lee) and Rotterdam practice SVESMI (Alexander Sverdlov), are multiple winners of the open international competition A101 in Moscow, Russia. A101 Block City is the first phase of a huge 13,000 ha area south of Moscow that is developed by the Masshtab company. Author of the urban planning concept for the whole A101 project is a team led by Maxwan architects from Rotterdam.

The Block City area of 157 ha and 12 million sqm. of housing is the first part of the A101 project be realized. For the design of this area two competitions have been organized: a closed competition for the design of a master plan and an open competition for the design of an urban block. The basis for the master plan design is the Block City concept. It envisions the introduction of standard sizes for urban blocks. This enables a simultaneous development of the project on the level of architecture and urban design. Moreover, since blocks are interchangeable it offers flexibility in the typology and the phasing of the project at each stage of its realization. 

The block size was defined as 75 x 125 m. Participants had the choice of two densities: 14,000 or 28,000 sqm of housing with 80/160 parking places to be realized within the block. The competition organizers received 210 projects: around 75 from Russia, the rest from some 30 other countries. An international jury, which includes Hans Stimmann and Dick van Gameren, awarded prizes in both low and high density. De Architekten Cie/SVESMI won both categories along with an additional honorable mention.

Tower Block, Winner High Density

This reinterpretation of the classical European block is architectonically based on arranging four tower-socle buildings into a composition, which encloses an inner courtyard. This configuration maintains the perim­eter height of the block at 6 storeys (21.5m) which, when repeated over multiple blocks, creates a human scaled urban plan and an ideal street profile in terms of solar access and quality.

Tower Block, Winner High Density - Courtyard

The height of the towers is variable depending on density requirements and solar access (obviously the higher towers should be positioned to the north). Furthermore, the mass of the block is mitigated through gaps in the perimeter where one tower-socle meets another. These gaps not only allow light to pen­etrate but also provide small view corridors into and out of the block.

Tower Block, Winner High Density - Axo

 

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density

In contrast to the decidedly urban quality of a massive urban block, this proposal attempts to subdivide the block into smaller scaled objects.

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density - Perspective

This scale reduction is useful in periphery urban conditions where the standard block typology begins to transform into lower density types of urbanism/ suburbanism (such as individual villas).

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density - Courtyard

The scheme con­tinues to demarcate the spatial figure of the block to the surroundings, however from the interior the block is in fact 6 small blocks organized on the plot to provide maximum solar access, views, and private park­ing.

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density - Axo

 

Eurika, Honorable Mention

On the one hand, EURIKA maintains the spacious parameters of a classi­cal block and secures the private exclusive character of its inner commu­nal courtyard. The proposed composition is easily recognized as an urban unit: it gives a sense of particular address in the city and makes clear distinction between the private and public/street space.

Eurika, Honorable Mention - Perspective

On the other hand, it plays out the familiar scale of the five-storey build­ing and the qualities of the standard Soviet layout. With traditional proportions improved, building materials brought to another level, and apartments planned to suit contemporary lifestyles, EURIKA still ac­knowledges its distant kinship with the microrayon and on the scale of the individual building - with ‘khrushchevka’.

Eurika, Honorable Mention - Courtyard

It is an ideal living environ­ment for those who grew up in the Soviet city but work and travel today all over the world. This project attempts to extract and casually put together the better quali­ties of both prototypical situations: Europe+Russia = Eurika

Eurika, Honorable Mention - Axo

De Architekten Cie and SVESMI combines the extensive experience in housing design in the Netherlands with knowledge of the Russian urban context and the Russian construction situation.

For this competition the team has submitted several proposals all of which elaborated on how the time-tested European typology of an urban block can be developed for and adjusted to the very different and specific reality of Russian contemporary city.

All projects were based on strong conviction that planning of affordable housing of today should focus more than ever on rationality and sustainability of design. In a critical economic situation, when any given housing project becomes a battlefield for every euro, dollar or rouble, the argument built around technical rationality and affordability stands a better chance.  Moreover, operating within the narrow margins of rational solutions, architect/planner gain possibilities to enhance the qualities of design itself: to use better materials,  plan more sophisticated details and installations.   

Find floor plans and sections of the three entries in the image gallery below:     

Related

urban ● svesmi ● russia ● residential ● moscow ● maxwan ● master plan ● housing ● europe ● de architekten cie ● a101 block city ● a101

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Three Winning A101 Block City Entries by de Architekten Cie/SVESMI

MVRDV wins competition for $250M Rotterdam ‘landmark’

New architecture and design competitions: Warming Huts, NOMA Phil Freelon Professional Design Awards, AIA COTE Top Ten for Students, and Portland Waterfront Park Design

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a yoga pavilion in Italy. The Oak Moon Pavilion is launched!

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Use architecture to create different emotional states. Museum of Emotions #9 is launched!

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Take a seat and make a statement. The Architect's Chair / Stockholm Furniture Fair Edition is launched!

Six projects make 2026 Stirling Prize shortlist for UK’s best new building

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Mujassam Watan Urban Sculpture Challenge #8 FINAL registration deadline is in 5 DAYS!

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design the future of Vancouver’s skyline. Vancouver Tall Challenge is launched!

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design an observation tower in Latvia. The Quiet Tower is launched!

The Architect’s Chair competition: 5th edition reveals winning designs

UK’s best new architecture honored at 2026 RIBA National Awards

World Architecture Festival: Explore the shortlisted finalists for 2026

New architecture and design competitions: Tiny Houses, A' Design Award, L A M P, and Walzwerk

Studio Gang receives 2026 AIA Chicago Firm Award for ‘conceptual rigor’

Ellen Peirson wins 2026 Wheelwright Prize for kitchens as ‘mineral landscapes’

Next page » Loading

Three Winning A101 Block City Entries by de Architekten Cie/SVESMI

By Bustler Editors|

Tuesday, Jan 4, 2011

Share

Tower Block, Winner High Density - Perspective

Related

urban ● svesmi ● russia ● residential ● moscow ● maxwan ● master plan ● housing ● europe ● de architekten cie ● a101 block city ● a101

The joint venture of Amsterdam-based de Architekten Cie. (Frits van Dongen, Patrick Koschuch and Jason Lee) and Rotterdam practice SVESMI (Alexander Sverdlov), are multiple winners of the open international competition A101 in Moscow, Russia. A101 Block City is the first phase of a huge 13,000 ha area south of Moscow that is developed by the Masshtab company. Author of the urban planning concept for the whole A101 project is a team led by Maxwan architects from Rotterdam.

The Block City area of 157 ha and 12 million sqm. of housing is the first part of the A101 project be realized. For the design of this area two competitions have been organized: a closed competition for the design of a master plan and an open competition for the design of an urban block. The basis for the master plan design is the Block City concept. It envisions the introduction of standard sizes for urban blocks. This enables a simultaneous development of the project on the level of architecture and urban design. Moreover, since blocks are interchangeable it offers flexibility in the typology and the phasing of the project at each stage of its realization. 

The block size was defined as 75 x 125 m. Participants had the choice of two densities: 14,000 or 28,000 sqm of housing with 80/160 parking places to be realized within the block. The competition organizers received 210 projects: around 75 from Russia, the rest from some 30 other countries. An international jury, which includes Hans Stimmann and Dick van Gameren, awarded prizes in both low and high density. De Architekten Cie/SVESMI won both categories along with an additional honorable mention.

Tower Block, Winner High Density

This reinterpretation of the classical European block is architectonically based on arranging four tower-socle buildings into a composition, which encloses an inner courtyard. This configuration maintains the perim­eter height of the block at 6 storeys (21.5m) which, when repeated over multiple blocks, creates a human scaled urban plan and an ideal street profile in terms of solar access and quality.

Tower Block, Winner High Density - Courtyard

The height of the towers is variable depending on density requirements and solar access (obviously the higher towers should be positioned to the north). Furthermore, the mass of the block is mitigated through gaps in the perimeter where one tower-socle meets another. These gaps not only allow light to pen­etrate but also provide small view corridors into and out of the block.

Tower Block, Winner High Density - Axo

 

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density

In contrast to the decidedly urban quality of a massive urban block, this proposal attempts to subdivide the block into smaller scaled objects.

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density - Perspective

This scale reduction is useful in periphery urban conditions where the standard block typology begins to transform into lower density types of urbanism/ suburbanism (such as individual villas).

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density - Courtyard

The scheme con­tinues to demarcate the spatial figure of the block to the surroundings, however from the interior the block is in fact 6 small blocks organized on the plot to provide maximum solar access, views, and private park­ing.

Six of a Kind, Winner Low Density - Axo

 

Eurika, Honorable Mention

On the one hand, EURIKA maintains the spacious parameters of a classi­cal block and secures the private exclusive character of its inner commu­nal courtyard. The proposed composition is easily recognized as an urban unit: it gives a sense of particular address in the city and makes clear distinction between the private and public/street space.

Eurika, Honorable Mention - Perspective

On the other hand, it plays out the familiar scale of the five-storey build­ing and the qualities of the standard Soviet layout. With traditional proportions improved, building materials brought to another level, and apartments planned to suit contemporary lifestyles, EURIKA still ac­knowledges its distant kinship with the microrayon and on the scale of the individual building - with ‘khrushchevka’.

Eurika, Honorable Mention - Courtyard

It is an ideal living environ­ment for those who grew up in the Soviet city but work and travel today all over the world. This project attempts to extract and casually put together the better quali­ties of both prototypical situations: Europe+Russia = Eurika

Eurika, Honorable Mention - Axo

De Architekten Cie and SVESMI combines the extensive experience in housing design in the Netherlands with knowledge of the Russian urban context and the Russian construction situation.

For this competition the team has submitted several proposals all of which elaborated on how the time-tested European typology of an urban block can be developed for and adjusted to the very different and specific reality of Russian contemporary city.

All projects were based on strong conviction that planning of affordable housing of today should focus more than ever on rationality and sustainability of design. In a critical economic situation, when any given housing project becomes a battlefield for every euro, dollar or rouble, the argument built around technical rationality and affordability stands a better chance.  Moreover, operating within the narrow margins of rational solutions, architect/planner gain possibilities to enhance the qualities of design itself: to use better materials,  plan more sophisticated details and installations.   

Find floor plans and sections of the three entries in the image gallery below:     

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Director of Client Development (Multifamily) – Northern California

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Director of Client Development (Multifamily) – Northern California

Pleasanton, CA, US

Junior Designer – Architecture & Visualization

Jonathan Caplan Design

Junior Designer – Architecture & Visualization

New York, NY, US

Proposal Coordinator

Trahan Architects

Proposal Coordinator

New York, NY, US

Job Captain - Residential

DAHLIN Architecture | Planning | Interiors

Job Captain - Residential

Pleasanton, CA, US

Job Captain / Architectural Designer (4-6 Years’ Experience)

Millan Architect / Studio Inc.

Job Captain / Architectural Designer (4-6 Years’ Experience)

Venice, CA, US

Junior to Mid-Career Designer – Coop-Condo Renovations

ECA (Ethelind Coblin Architect)

Junior to Mid-Career Designer – Coop-Condo Renovations

New York, NY, US

Specifications Writer

LMN

Specifications Writer

Seattle, WA, US

Project Architect

READ Architecture Design

Project Architect

Brooklyn, NY, US

Project Architect, San Francisco/Boston

Bull Stockwell Allen

Project Architect, San Francisco/Boston

San Francisco, CA, US

Architect / Project Manager

Curtis + Ginsberg Architects LLP

Architect / Project Manager

New York, NY, US

Next page » Loading