• Login / Join
  • About
  • •
  • Contact
  • •
  • Advertising
bustler logo
bustler logo
  • News
  • Competitions
  • Events
  • Bustler is powered by Archinect
  • Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

  • Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • Search

    Search in

  • Submit

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event
  • Login / Join
  • News|Competitions|Events
  • Search
    | Submit
    | Follow
  • Search in

    What are you submitting?

    News Pitch
    Competition
    Event

    Follow these Bustler feeds:

  • About|Contact|Advertising
  • Login / Join

When innovation runs shallow: What's the commotion with eVolo winner New York Horizon?

By Justine Testado|

Friday, Apr 8, 2016

2016 eVolo Skyscraper Competition 1st prizewinner: “New York Horizon” by Jianshi Wu and Yitan Sun.

Developing ideas that fuse the natural and built environments are commonplace in design competitions alone. But what really grabs attention is the wilder approaches, which tend to appear in global idea-based contests like eVolo Magazine's yearly Skyscraper Competition. Recently concluding its tenth edition, the Skyscraper Competition gives participants complete freedom over their reinterpretations of the skyscraper typology. New York-based designers Jianshi Wu and Yitan Sun scooped this year's first-prize award with their entry titled “New York Horizon”, a 1,000-foot sunken horizontal “sidescraper” that unearths the bedrock hidden beneath New York City's Central Park and encases the exposed terrain in walls of glass built up to street level along the park's perimeter. At 100 feet wide, the glass walls would provide 7 square miles of housing spaces that offer unobstructed views of the underground park, as a way to “make Central Park available to more people”, the designers claimed in their project statement. In other words, the Central Park would be excavated.

As many critics have already pointed out, “New York Horizon” would be virtually impossible to implement in the real world, given the actual urban landscape of the proposed site, which includes some of NYC's subway lines for starters. That being said, the criticism “New York Horizon” has sparked in recent weeks raises bigger questions — particularly involving the rise of “meme-tecture”, the cultural value of landscape architecture, and re-evaluating the setup of open ideas competitions.

“New York Horizon” demonstrates the inevitable toll that viral media has taken on open architecture competitions.

Even just the thought of altering the beloved Central Park is touchy territory, let alone for landscape architects. Charles A. Birnbaum, a landscape architect who is the president and CEO of The Cultural Landscape Foundation, recently wrote in an opinion piece about how ideas like "New York Horizon" depict the constant sidelining of landscape architecture. He wrote:

“Designed by Frederick Law Olmsted Senior, (the "Founding Father" of landscape architecture) and Calvert Vaux, Central Park is arguably the most important work of art created in America in the 19th century. Yet, as we see constantly, designed landscapes are often viewed as merely incomplete or empty voids awaiting something to be placed within them, or, in this case, to be taken away [...] ["New York Horizon"], however, isn't just harmlessly provocative click bait. It perpetuates a broken value system in which architecture is seen as the great saviour, while landscape architecture is treated as ‘parsley around the roast,’ as the great Modernist landscape architect Thomas Church once observed.”

RELATED NEWS eVolo 2016 Skyscraper Competition winners reimagine vertical architecture
2016 eVolo Skyscraper Competition 1st prizewinner: “New York Horizon” by Jianshi Wu and Yitan Sun.

“New York Horizon” also demonstrates the inevitable toll that viral media has taken on open architecture competitions. On one hand, thanks to social media, these competitions — and the eye-candy renderings and shocking ideas they attract — can draw interest from broader audiences to learn more about architectural ideas. But some critics point out the problems that arise if the click-bait factor becomes prevalent, especially when it comes to a highly recognized contest like the Skyscraper Competition. CityLab writer Kriston Capps described "New York Horizon" as another example of Internet Contestist ideas, which he explains are “spectacles that are neither straightforward nor satirical [but instead, are] shallow and excessively social.”

“From London’s bridge fetish to the Guggenheim Helsinki, open design contests are responsible for producing some of the worst architectural renderings of the last year," Capps writes. “[O]pen design competitions encourage architects to volunteer their labor in an effort to grab the eyes of jury members and popular audiences alike. Open design contests encourage gambling. Factor in the accessible rendering software that lowers costs and barriers to use, and the trajectory converges at Contestism. The problem with Contestism isn’t ‘New York Horizon’ or any one single example. The problem may very well be the contests themselves.”

In a similar vein, other sources and users observe how the Skyscraper Competition entries tend to lean toward who creates the best-looking renderings or imagines the most outlandish dystopian scenario. “The idea of separating Central Park from the rest of the urban fabric of New York seems careless. It's shocking, so that makes it great for a rendering and a competition, but otherwise it's lazy design,” wrote one user on Bustler's sister site Archinect. “Nice art project,” another commenter wrote.” Hope it stays in the realm of academic naval [sic] gazing.”

Encouraging bold imaginative concepts and allowing designers full control and exploration of their own ideas are indeed vital in helping push architectural design forward. But how does broader society perceive these design competitions?

The scrutiny that a hypothetical concept like “New York Horizon” receives indicates that global idea contests like eVolo's Skyscraper Competition have an impact. Encouraging bold imaginative concepts and allowing designers full control and exploration of their own ideas are indeed vital in helping push architectural design forward. But how does broader society perceive these design competitions? What do non-architecturally involved folks get in encountering these ideas, other than ridicule or a few seconds ogling at pretty drawings? During a time when even architects themselves are questioning the relevance of their field to the rest of society, these popular ideas competitions have the visibility to show that they are more than cheap Internet click-bait. They can prove that outlandish ideas can become starting points that lead to something truly ground-breaking.

Have any thoughts on the criticism surrounding “New York Horizon”? What do you think open ideas competitions need to change? Share them in the comment section below.

RELATED COMPETITION eVolo 2016 Skyscraper Competition
RELATED NEWS Winners of the 2015 eVolo Skyscraper Competition

Related

evolo skyscraper competition ● new york city ● new york ● central park ● landscape architecture ● landscape design ● frederick law olmsted ● skyscraper competition ● evolo magazine ● competition ● ideas competitions ● design ideas ● cultural relevance ● innovation

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

When innovation runs shallow: What's the commotion with eVolo winner New York Horizon?

Zaha Hadid Architects to design a meandering Jinghe New City Culture & Art Centre

'Every landscape architect helps shape their community for the better': Meet the ASLA 2022 Class of Fellows

Steven Holl's vibrant Chapel of St. Ignatius is the 2022 AIA Twenty-Five Year Award winner

The Marker Design Challenge winners champion the trials, tribulations, and triumphs of women in architecture

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a movie pavilion set in the stunning scenery of northern Iceland: Iceland Movie Pavilion competition is launched!

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design meditation cabins to help Tokyo citizens destress and reconnect: Tokyo Urban Meditation Cabins competition is launched!

Sponsored Post by YACademy

YACademy alumni collaborate with Herzog & de Meuron to redesign the historical site of Cesare Roversi

Sponsored Post by Buildner

Design a structure raising awareness of past and ongoing injustices: Memorial for Witches competition is launched!

Sign up for Bustler's Email Newsletters

Winners of the 2022 Mass Timber Competition: Building to Net-Zero Carbon have been announced

29 new UK projects named 2022 RIBA National Awards winners

​Student teams from Georgia Tech and the University of Arizona among winners of the 2022 Solar Decathlon Design Challenge

Sponsored Post by YACademy

YACademy’s alumni design an installation at Arte Sella in collaboration with Mario Cucinella Architects

A joint proposal from BIG and HOK takes first place in the Zurich Airport's international 'Dock A' competition

Sponsored Post by YACademy

YACademy's 'Architecture for Fashion' 2022 Edition offers lectures and internships with MVRDV, Zaha Hadid Architects, and Toyo Ito & Associates

Sponsored Post by YACademy

Participate in YACademy's 2022 'Architecture for Heritage' training course and internship opportunity

Next page » Loading

When innovation runs shallow: What's the commotion with eVolo winner New York Horizon?

By Justine Testado|

Friday, Apr 8, 2016

Share

2016 eVolo Skyscraper Competition 1st prizewinner: “New York Horizon” by Jianshi Wu and Yitan Sun.

Related

evolo skyscraper competition ● new york city ● new york ● central park ● landscape architecture ● landscape design ● frederick law olmsted ● skyscraper competition ● evolo magazine ● competition ● ideas competitions ● design ideas ● cultural relevance ● innovation

Developing ideas that fuse the natural and built environments are commonplace in design competitions alone. But what really grabs attention is the wilder approaches, which tend to appear in global idea-based contests like eVolo Magazine's yearly Skyscraper Competition. Recently concluding its tenth edition, the Skyscraper Competition gives participants complete freedom over their reinterpretations of the skyscraper typology. New York-based designers Jianshi Wu and Yitan Sun scooped this year's first-prize award with their entry titled “New York Horizon”, a 1,000-foot sunken horizontal “sidescraper” that unearths the bedrock hidden beneath New York City's Central Park and encases the exposed terrain in walls of glass built up to street level along the park's perimeter. At 100 feet wide, the glass walls would provide 7 square miles of housing spaces that offer unobstructed views of the underground park, as a way to “make Central Park available to more people”, the designers claimed in their project statement. In other words, the Central Park would be excavated.

As many critics have already pointed out, “New York Horizon” would be virtually impossible to implement in the real world, given the actual urban landscape of the proposed site, which includes some of NYC's subway lines for starters. That being said, the criticism “New York Horizon” has sparked in recent weeks raises bigger questions — particularly involving the rise of “meme-tecture”, the cultural value of landscape architecture, and re-evaluating the setup of open ideas competitions.

“New York Horizon” demonstrates the inevitable toll that viral media has taken on open architecture competitions.

Even just the thought of altering the beloved Central Park is touchy territory, let alone for landscape architects. Charles A. Birnbaum, a landscape architect who is the president and CEO of The Cultural Landscape Foundation, recently wrote in an opinion piece about how ideas like "New York Horizon" depict the constant sidelining of landscape architecture. He wrote:

“Designed by Frederick Law Olmsted Senior, (the "Founding Father" of landscape architecture) and Calvert Vaux, Central Park is arguably the most important work of art created in America in the 19th century. Yet, as we see constantly, designed landscapes are often viewed as merely incomplete or empty voids awaiting something to be placed within them, or, in this case, to be taken away [...] ["New York Horizon"], however, isn't just harmlessly provocative click bait. It perpetuates a broken value system in which architecture is seen as the great saviour, while landscape architecture is treated as ‘parsley around the roast,’ as the great Modernist landscape architect Thomas Church once observed.”

RELATED NEWS eVolo 2016 Skyscraper Competition winners reimagine vertical architecture
2016 eVolo Skyscraper Competition 1st prizewinner: “New York Horizon” by Jianshi Wu and Yitan Sun.

“New York Horizon” also demonstrates the inevitable toll that viral media has taken on open architecture competitions. On one hand, thanks to social media, these competitions — and the eye-candy renderings and shocking ideas they attract — can draw interest from broader audiences to learn more about architectural ideas. But some critics point out the problems that arise if the click-bait factor becomes prevalent, especially when it comes to a highly recognized contest like the Skyscraper Competition. CityLab writer Kriston Capps described "New York Horizon" as another example of Internet Contestist ideas, which he explains are “spectacles that are neither straightforward nor satirical [but instead, are] shallow and excessively social.”

“From London’s bridge fetish to the Guggenheim Helsinki, open design contests are responsible for producing some of the worst architectural renderings of the last year," Capps writes. “[O]pen design competitions encourage architects to volunteer their labor in an effort to grab the eyes of jury members and popular audiences alike. Open design contests encourage gambling. Factor in the accessible rendering software that lowers costs and barriers to use, and the trajectory converges at Contestism. The problem with Contestism isn’t ‘New York Horizon’ or any one single example. The problem may very well be the contests themselves.”

In a similar vein, other sources and users observe how the Skyscraper Competition entries tend to lean toward who creates the best-looking renderings or imagines the most outlandish dystopian scenario. “The idea of separating Central Park from the rest of the urban fabric of New York seems careless. It's shocking, so that makes it great for a rendering and a competition, but otherwise it's lazy design,” wrote one user on Bustler's sister site Archinect. “Nice art project,” another commenter wrote.” Hope it stays in the realm of academic naval [sic] gazing.”

Encouraging bold imaginative concepts and allowing designers full control and exploration of their own ideas are indeed vital in helping push architectural design forward. But how does broader society perceive these design competitions?

The scrutiny that a hypothetical concept like “New York Horizon” receives indicates that global idea contests like eVolo's Skyscraper Competition have an impact. Encouraging bold imaginative concepts and allowing designers full control and exploration of their own ideas are indeed vital in helping push architectural design forward. But how does broader society perceive these design competitions? What do non-architecturally involved folks get in encountering these ideas, other than ridicule or a few seconds ogling at pretty drawings? During a time when even architects themselves are questioning the relevance of their field to the rest of society, these popular ideas competitions have the visibility to show that they are more than cheap Internet click-bait. They can prove that outlandish ideas can become starting points that lead to something truly ground-breaking.

Have any thoughts on the criticism surrounding “New York Horizon”? What do you think open ideas competitions need to change? Share them in the comment section below.

RELATED COMPETITION eVolo 2016 Skyscraper Competition
RELATED NEWS Winners of the 2015 eVolo Skyscraper Competition

Share

  • Follow

    0 Comments

  • Comment as :

Archinect JobsArchinect Jobs

The Archinect Job Board attracts the world's top architectural design talents.

VIEW ALL JOBS POST A JOB

Architectural Planner

Dahlin Group Architecture Planning

Architectural Planner

Pleasanton, CA, US

Project Designer I

West of West

Project Designer I

Portland, OR, US

Project Designer/Project Architect

Byggmeister Design-Build

Project Designer/Project Architect

Newton, MA, US

Interior Architect / Project Architect

Jamie Bush & Co.

Interior Architect / Project Architect

Los Angeles, CA, US

Architect/Designer with Healthcare Experience

Payette

Architect/Designer with Healthcare Experience

Boston, MA, US

Architect - Project Manager

GGLO

Architect - Project Manager

Boise, ID, US

Junior Architect / Designer

de Reus Architects

Junior Architect / Designer

Sun Valley, ID, US

Project Manager

Aaron Brumer & Associates Architects

Project Manager

North Hollywood, CA, US

Architecture Job Captain / Project Manager

John Kaliski Architects (JKA)

Architecture Job Captain / Project Manager

Los Angeles, CA, US

Design Professional

Orion Cityscape

Design Professional

Los Angeles, CA, US

Next page » Loading